Sunday, April 23, 2006

Richard Lindzen, contrarian

Thanks to Science Blogger Janet D. Stemwedel for pointing out this revealing personal glimpse of Richard Lindzen, one of the most qualified global warming skeptics (He's actually scientifically trained in the field, not a professional pontificator):

Among the scientists taking a public position sceptical of global warming, Richard Lindzen has always seemed the most credible. Unlike nearly all “sceptics”, he’s a real climate scientist who has done significant research on climate change, and, also unlike most of them, there’s no evidence that he has a partisan or financial axe to grind. His view that the evidence on climate change is insufficient to include that the observed increase in temperature is due to human activity therefore seems like one that should be taken seriously.

Or it would do if it were not for a 2001 Newsweek interview (no good link available, but Google a sentence or two and you can find it) What’s interesting here is not the (now somewhat out of date) statement of Lindzen’s views on climate change, but the following paragraph

Lindzen clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He’ll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking. He speaks in full, impeccably logical paragraphs, and he punctuates his measured cadences with thoughtful drags on a cigarette.

Anyone who could draw this conclusion in the light of the evidence, and act on it as Lindzen has done, is clearly useless as a source of advice on any issue involving the analysis of statistical evidence.

Also, read Tim Lambert on the global warming deniers who started out as tobacco danger deniers.

There's a word for scientists who sell their research and name, and it's not a very pretty one.



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
|

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?